That mission story was super detailed, and probably lasted me a good forty minutes. Take the one at Thornbridge Manor, for example, where you pose as a detective and solve a murder, before actually committing one yourself. In some missions I find this quite annoying, because it feels like IO are being stingy, but in other cases I can fully understand why there are only three. I won't tell you why though, because that would be a spoiler!). Most locations have only three, but some have none at all (such as the final mission. In the previous games there were quite a few mission stories, maybe six or seven per mission? In Hitman 3 it's a bit different. Now let's talk about the mission stories. I won't dish out any spoilers, but let's just say you won't be expecting that final mission. I was actually engaged in the cutscenes for once! If you felt that the previous two games were somewhat limp in that department, you don't have to concern yourself with that for Hitman 3. Now the story: Hitman 2016 had a very basic story that felt more like an excuse to string together the assassinations than anything else, Hitman 2's story was more complicated and had several cool twists but still felt a little forced, however Hitman 3 delivers an absolutely brilliant story in my opinion. I often found myself replaying a mission four or five times in order to explore every location and complete every challenge, as much as I did with the previous two games. The changes that have been made, however, are great, the most notable of which is Agent 47's brand-new hacker-camera, which can hack electronic locks among other things (such as taking photos, duh). Hitman 2 was pretty spot-on, there weren't many issues to fix. Not many changes have been made to the gameplay from Hitman 2, but to be honest, I'm fine with that. Hitman 3 is, undoubtedly, the best of the series.